gugucom
May 1, 09:46 AM
In the Finder:
Menu Bar > Go > Connect to Server > Mac Pro IP or what ever the name of your machine is called Mac-Pro.local
And your done, might even bookmark it if you use it often.
Thanks, that worked. A pity that bonjour cannot do it automatically.
Menu Bar > Go > Connect to Server > Mac Pro IP or what ever the name of your machine is called Mac-Pro.local
And your done, might even bookmark it if you use it often.
Thanks, that worked. A pity that bonjour cannot do it automatically.
logana
Apr 15, 03:23 AM
Almost certainly the bottom case is wrong - that is why the heatsink screws have nowhere to screw into. There are 3 bottom cases - you need version 2.
I suspect you have v1 or v3. Check the part number - should be in the bottom left corner of the optical drive bay. The part number for the bottom case for your model is 815-9744.
I suspect you have v1 or v3. Check the part number - should be in the bottom left corner of the optical drive bay. The part number for the bottom case for your model is 815-9744.
benhollberg
Mar 14, 10:44 AM
Just called the Apple store at the Gateway. There is a line of 5 people right now and they haven't even received a shipment yet today.
iknowyourider
Jun 27, 10:24 AM
sorry, but does anyone have any idea as to what i should list this whole package for?
mac2 sell only does the computer itself...
If I read mac2sell right the mini is worth $620. Plus $80 for KB, throw in mouse. That's $700. You might find iwork on ebay for $50 but I'm not sure if most buyers care. Maybe $750 shipped?
mac2 sell only does the computer itself...
If I read mac2sell right the mini is worth $620. Plus $80 for KB, throw in mouse. That's $700. You might find iwork on ebay for $50 but I'm not sure if most buyers care. Maybe $750 shipped?
macdatadrive
Apr 30, 02:39 AM
Oh well. Guess it's 256mb for this old thing. Thanks anyway. Could I use a MacBook Hard Drive?
Dagless
Mar 26, 10:59 AM
Yeah, it looks nice but I'm a bit bored of the genre now. I loved Air Combat on the PS1 but I tried to get back into it with the newer games and eh, looks like I'm not missing out on much.
Joint Assault on the PSP looked brilliant and reminded me a lot of Peace Walker (probably my fave game of 2010) but it just wasn't fun to play.
Joint Assault on the PSP looked brilliant and reminded me a lot of Peace Walker (probably my fave game of 2010) but it just wasn't fun to play.
jefhatfield
Jul 6, 08:53 PM
Originally posted by sparkleytone
i couldnt stand that guy man. always posting all this pc news and just generally baiting everyone. grrr.
i think the jefhatfield thing is a trick question. IIRC jefhatfield IS his original name, but he used a different one for a while after his posts became TOO prolific.
and the avatar, that was the sexy shiny one right? yeah that started a craze. personally i think b2tm's was the best.
i was jefhatfield, then networkman, and now i am jefhatfield again
i couldnt stand that guy man. always posting all this pc news and just generally baiting everyone. grrr.
i think the jefhatfield thing is a trick question. IIRC jefhatfield IS his original name, but he used a different one for a while after his posts became TOO prolific.
and the avatar, that was the sexy shiny one right? yeah that started a craze. personally i think b2tm's was the best.
i was jefhatfield, then networkman, and now i am jefhatfield again
Martin C
Oct 25, 06:09 PM
I will be there.
But I keep forgetting which subway station is the closest stop to the 5th Ave store...
Here you go...
But I keep forgetting which subway station is the closest stop to the 5th Ave store...
Here you go...
ZilogZ80
Mar 31, 10:51 AM
my frustration isn't with the Dev Team, it's with Apple. They're focusing sooooo much energy on fighting jailbreaking
really? do you have evidence to back this up?
really? do you have evidence to back this up?
Broc27
Feb 15, 10:20 PM
Hello there!
I set up a mac mini server for my little company a few months ago and I find it to be overkill for the simple tasks I use it for. Originally I planned to setup a web hosting service, an email server and a wiki but our needs didn't grow as I expected and we found simpler alternatives.
Anyway, I am now thinking about selling it but I was wondering if it was simple to transfer the Mac OS X Server license. I can't seem to find info online on how to do this and I don't want to sell a product which won't easily be usable.
Any tips on doing this?
Thanks!
I set up a mac mini server for my little company a few months ago and I find it to be overkill for the simple tasks I use it for. Originally I planned to setup a web hosting service, an email server and a wiki but our needs didn't grow as I expected and we found simpler alternatives.
Anyway, I am now thinking about selling it but I was wondering if it was simple to transfer the Mac OS X Server license. I can't seem to find info online on how to do this and I don't want to sell a product which won't easily be usable.
Any tips on doing this?
Thanks!
rasp
Dec 14, 12:16 AM
a virus if it will help apple with its marketshare problem... :rolleyes:
Please, no more viruses for windows, I get to admin the things at work all day and there is plenty to slow machines down for decades to come.
Nifty icon though.
Please, no more viruses for windows, I get to admin the things at work all day and there is plenty to slow machines down for decades to come.
Nifty icon though.
Muscle Master
Nov 1, 02:16 AM
Here mine.. thinking bout getting one
http://img828.imageshack.us/img828/765/srt8.png
http://img828.imageshack.us/img828/765/srt8.png
Reticent
Apr 30, 01:39 PM
Ok. Just stupid again. Just needed to re-install adobe reader. Geez, that was not a tough fix.
jettredmont
Oct 4, 02:59 PM
could be. but honestly i don't think that's a good thing. it just makes the equipment more expensive, clunky and less capable than dedicated devices. after all you don't need that feat all the time. only once in a while and then you bring the extra gps. cramming a gps in nowadays small P&S or even DSLR's is just expensive and complicated.
my two cents.
Every cell phone sold in the US has to have a working GPS device in it, and the GPS has to be "on" at all times.
Cost and power consumption are hardly issues. The only extra cost is adding an interface to the GPS unit to get the latest location data (which might be the front door of the building you're in if you're inside). The only extra power consumption is that needed to initiate and react to that poll, which is negligible (obviously).
But, yes, adding such a feature on a straight digicam or DSLR wouldn't necessarily make much sense. However, compared to the cost of an external GPS, which records "breadcrumbs" constantly (instead of just when you take a picture, because it doesn't know when you take a picture) and has enough memory and battery to hold said breadcrumbs throughout a, say, two-day road trip, integrating a low-power GPS into a camera doesn't sound all that far-fetched. But, I don't see camera makers doing that until GPS-locating of photos shows signs of taking off, which it doesn't, yet.
my two cents.
Every cell phone sold in the US has to have a working GPS device in it, and the GPS has to be "on" at all times.
Cost and power consumption are hardly issues. The only extra cost is adding an interface to the GPS unit to get the latest location data (which might be the front door of the building you're in if you're inside). The only extra power consumption is that needed to initiate and react to that poll, which is negligible (obviously).
But, yes, adding such a feature on a straight digicam or DSLR wouldn't necessarily make much sense. However, compared to the cost of an external GPS, which records "breadcrumbs" constantly (instead of just when you take a picture, because it doesn't know when you take a picture) and has enough memory and battery to hold said breadcrumbs throughout a, say, two-day road trip, integrating a low-power GPS into a camera doesn't sound all that far-fetched. But, I don't see camera makers doing that until GPS-locating of photos shows signs of taking off, which it doesn't, yet.
dethmaShine
May 4, 10:38 AM
That would be great indeed! There's a Safari extension that does that, but it's terrrrribly bad and it doesn't really work either. Safari extensions are all cr*p.
Many are crap. :)
But that's a great idea OP (even if it's not yours - I don't know). Apple should implement this in Safari and I think it will.
Many are crap. :)
But that's a great idea OP (even if it's not yours - I don't know). Apple should implement this in Safari and I think it will.
dupokey
Mar 11, 04:05 PM
I'm at the BB in Murray. There are probably about 30 - 35 people in line at the moment.
Eraserhead
Sep 2, 03:21 PM
I think that would be the way forward. I don't have time myself to implement it though
hansiedejong
Nov 1, 09:25 AM
http://www.onemorething.nl/uploads/community/07f8ff6625002d9449e47bac62b801c6c3ed6d06_0.png
chrono1081
Apr 9, 01:09 AM
Hi guys,
I'm working on a project in Corona SDK (omg if you never used it its amazing! I can't tell you how much faster my projects been going since I switched from hand coding everything to using Corona.)
Anyway I want to make my app universal but I can't seem to find way to load images specific to the iPad without having to scale them.
For the iPhone 3Gs and the iPhone 4G Corona uses Apples model of @2x to load different resolution images, but is there a way to also do this for iPad?
I know its a super long shot and this isn't the best forum to ask in but since I didn't buy Corona yet I don't have access to their forums.
I'm working on a project in Corona SDK (omg if you never used it its amazing! I can't tell you how much faster my projects been going since I switched from hand coding everything to using Corona.)
Anyway I want to make my app universal but I can't seem to find way to load images specific to the iPad without having to scale them.
For the iPhone 3Gs and the iPhone 4G Corona uses Apples model of @2x to load different resolution images, but is there a way to also do this for iPad?
I know its a super long shot and this isn't the best forum to ask in but since I didn't buy Corona yet I don't have access to their forums.
tjb1
Apr 30, 06:40 PM
Have you tried running Windows 98 as virtual machine (VM) in Parallels Desktop or VMWare Fusion (both have demos to download) or VirtualBox? Windows 98 software is hardly that demanding, that it needs to run native, I could even run Command & Conquer via VM on my 2007 iMac once or twice.
THe problem with Windows 98 is getting drivers that are compatible with the new hardware, im assuming this is what the op's question is related to. And I would not use the two paid ones as demos personally. I have only had Parallels but once you install it, it drives itself deep into everything and after uninstalling according to all there documentation I was still finding crap with the || on it and even new files that are Windows like .exe were somehow getting the || badge on it.
THe problem with Windows 98 is getting drivers that are compatible with the new hardware, im assuming this is what the op's question is related to. And I would not use the two paid ones as demos personally. I have only had Parallels but once you install it, it drives itself deep into everything and after uninstalling according to all there documentation I was still finding crap with the || on it and even new files that are Windows like .exe were somehow getting the || badge on it.
twoodcc
Oct 26, 09:51 AM
well now, so the video ipod is coming very soon huh?
Roessnakhan
Nov 22, 09:50 AM
http://roessnakhan.deviantart.com
firestarter
Mar 10, 02:37 AM
Another HDD space junkie! :D I will buy 1 or 2 TB drives for the Mac Pro. However, what if I buy 1 TB drives and they puke before I fill them up?
Seriously, if you can't find a use for 1TB of space in 3 or 4 years, then you probably shouldn't be buying a MacPro.
Most photography apps don't need lots of cores (they just don't use them). The only appeal of a MacPro to a photographer is the expandability - lots of drives, interchangeable graphics cards. If you don't need the expandability, iMacs are much much better value machines.
If you're seriously worried about saving $30 by buying a slower 500GB drive instead of a faster 1TB drive, you're definitely wasting cash spending $3000 on a MacPro.
I am not being a smart @@S, just asking a legitimate question, as that scenario is my only concern. Also, thanks for clarifying that RAID is not for backup. my good friend uses RAID to backup, but he never writes to his drives, only reads. They are for storing tons of movies and games.
Is that right? How did the data get on to the RAID in the first place?
If your friend only has one copy of his files (on the RAID) then he doesn't have a backup. Backup = an alternate copy.
Not writing to that RAID doesn't make it magically safer... Your friend should get a backup if he's smart and he values his data.
Off-site storage is a big deal with photographers and I understand the benefits, but I never would have added 1+1. LOL
Not so funny when a thief breaks into your house and steals your Mac and the backup drive sat on the table next to it. Proper backups aren't just for professionals - they're for anyone who actually cares about keeping their data.
For someone with a $3000 Mac, a couple of hundred $ to buy enough disks to keep offsite copies is nothing.
I am still thinking about my backup plan, but I have plenty of options thanks to the photographer community! As I stated in my last reply, I will clear my mind this weekend and in all likelihood, order a new Mac Pro 8 core soon.
Sounds like you should be looking at an iMac.
Seriously, if you can't find a use for 1TB of space in 3 or 4 years, then you probably shouldn't be buying a MacPro.
Most photography apps don't need lots of cores (they just don't use them). The only appeal of a MacPro to a photographer is the expandability - lots of drives, interchangeable graphics cards. If you don't need the expandability, iMacs are much much better value machines.
If you're seriously worried about saving $30 by buying a slower 500GB drive instead of a faster 1TB drive, you're definitely wasting cash spending $3000 on a MacPro.
I am not being a smart @@S, just asking a legitimate question, as that scenario is my only concern. Also, thanks for clarifying that RAID is not for backup. my good friend uses RAID to backup, but he never writes to his drives, only reads. They are for storing tons of movies and games.
Is that right? How did the data get on to the RAID in the first place?
If your friend only has one copy of his files (on the RAID) then he doesn't have a backup. Backup = an alternate copy.
Not writing to that RAID doesn't make it magically safer... Your friend should get a backup if he's smart and he values his data.
Off-site storage is a big deal with photographers and I understand the benefits, but I never would have added 1+1. LOL
Not so funny when a thief breaks into your house and steals your Mac and the backup drive sat on the table next to it. Proper backups aren't just for professionals - they're for anyone who actually cares about keeping their data.
For someone with a $3000 Mac, a couple of hundred $ to buy enough disks to keep offsite copies is nothing.
I am still thinking about my backup plan, but I have plenty of options thanks to the photographer community! As I stated in my last reply, I will clear my mind this weekend and in all likelihood, order a new Mac Pro 8 core soon.
Sounds like you should be looking at an iMac.
Huntn
Mar 10, 10:47 PM
Bravo guys. Capitalism can be energizing but it only works if the majority of citizens bother to vote in leadership that looks out for all citizens, not favor a handful of the most well off citizens. It's our fault we keep electing bozos to Washington.
No comments:
Post a Comment